Nios® V/II Embedded Design Suite (EDS)
Support for Embedded Development Tools, Processors (SoCs and Nios® V/II processor), Embedded Development Suites (EDSs), Boot and Configuration, Operating Systems, C and C++

UsbBlaster uneder Linux

Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor II
997 Views

Hello, 

 

I have a problem using my UsbBlaster under Linux. I actually have a ByteBlaster MV which works with both Quartus2 programmer and Nios2-IDE (nios2-download), under Windows and Linux. 

My UsbBlaster works perfectly under Windows too (Quartus2 and Nios2-IDE), but under Linux it only works for Quartus2, not for the Nios2-IDE. Isuppose it is corrrectly installed since Quartus2 can use it, but there is apparently a problem with nios2-download when reading the timestamp and ID... 

Here is what I get when I try a nios2-download first with the ByteBlasterMV 

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div> 

--- Quote Start ---  

[SOPC Builder]$ nios2-download --cable=1 --accept-bad-sysid sand1.elf -g 

Using cable "ByteBlasterMV [/dev/parport0]", device 2, instance 0x00 

Processor is already paused 

Reading System ID at address 0x01180808: verified 

Downloaded 116KB in 4.3s (26.9KB/s) 

Verified OK 

Starting processor at address 0x010001C8[/b] 

--- Quote End ---  

 

 

and with the Usb-Blaster on the same system : 

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div> 

--- Quote Start ---  

[SOPC Builder]$ nios2-download --cable=2 --accept-bad-sysid sand1.elf 

Using cable "USB-Blaster [USB 3/2]", device 2, instance 0x00 

Pausing target processor: not responding. 

Resetting and trying again: OK 

Reading System ID at address 0x01180808: does not match 

    ID value does not match: read 0x00001919; expected 0x39FF6718 

    Timestamp value does not match: image on board is older than expected 

    Read timestamp  1:43:04 2000/11/01; expected 17:02:12 2005/05/31 

Warning: The software you are downloading may not run on the system which 

is currently configured into the device. 

Downloaded 116KB in 1.8s (64.4KB/s) 

Verifying 01000020 ( 0%) 

Verify failed 

Leaving target processor paused[/b] 

--- Quote End ---  

 

 

Does anybody know something about this strange behavior ? 

 

Thanks in advance 

 

pod
0 Kudos
0 Replies
Reply