- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I am planning to switch my design to MAX 5 as the current part that I am using (MAX3000A) has EOL-ed. Is MAX 5 recommended for new design? Will it EOL in the next 5 to 10 years? If MAX 5 is not recommended, what is the recommended alternative closest to MAX3000A? Also, I have some technical questions. 1) When I synthesize my design with MAX3000A using Quartus II version 7.2 SP2, the total Macrocells used is 56. However, when I synthesize the same design with MAX 5 (5M80ZE64C5N), the total LE used is 117 (greater than the capacity of this part). 5M80ZE64C5N is supposed to contains equivalent of 64 Macrocells, so I am surprise that this part cannot fit the original design. I look at the .map.rpt file for both the synthesis, and saw something not quite right. Under the section “Analysis & Synthesis Resource Utilization by Entity”, the resources used by “Frame_signals:inst14”, MAX3000A uses 6 Macrocells, but MAX5 uses 57 logic elements. This “Frame_signals:inst14” is actually a State machine: "|xxxxx|Frame_signals:inst14|statem" contains 32 states and 6 state bits. Does MAX3000A and MAX 5 handles state machines differently? Do I need to modify the way I coded the state machines? Please help. Thanks.Link Copied
1 Reply
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
A different macro cell utilization is expectable due to the different architecture. MAX V 4-input-LUT is less effective if a logic term has many inputs.
We need to look at the code to determine if it might be optimized, e.g. by changing the state variable coding. Using a high level description according to Altera state machine templates should generally give good results.
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page